After more than fifty years of the War on Drugs, it is safe to say that its consequences have been very disappointing. Apart from the apparent failure of the state to suppress the usage of psychoactive drugs, could some of them (particularly psychedelics) benefit us as individuals?
The intersection between Objectivism and psychedelics remains largely unexplored, yet it offers a unique lens through which we can evaluate both the philosophical principles of Ayn Rand and the transformative potential of these substances. While psychedelics have traditionally been viewed as harmful or counterproductive, their potential benefits – particularly in therapeutic contexts – have begun to garner attention in recent years. This article explores whether psychedelics, particularly when used responsibly, could align with Objectivist principles, or if their inherent effects on consciousness present a philosophical contradiction to Ayn Rand’s ideas about objective reality and rational self-interest.
Philosophical and Historical Context
Objectivism, Ayn Rand’s philosophy, emphasises the primacy of objective reality, reason, and individualism. According to Rand, reality exists independently of consciousness, and it is through rational thought that individuals can engage with the world meaningfully. Altered states of consciousness, such as those induced by psychedelics, would seem to conflict with this principle by distorting one’s perception of reality, which could potentially undermine the Objectivist emphasis on clear, rational thinking.
Historically, the legal status of psychedelics has been shaped by political factors, such as the “War on Drugs” initiated under Richard Nixon’s administration. The prohibition of psychedelics, alongside many other substances, has played a significant role in shaping public perception of their potential harm. Despite this, there has been a resurgence in research on psychedelics, with institutions like Johns Hopkins University leading the way in exploring their potential therapeutic uses. This shift in focus is important as it signals a reconsideration of psychedelics in light of modern science and changing attitudes.
The Libertarian Perspective
Before diving into Objectivism, it is worth briefly exploring the libertarian view on psychedelics, as it shares many similarities with Objectivism, particularly when it comes to personal autonomy. Libertarians advocate for individual freedom and the right to make decisions about one’s own body. From this perspective, the prohibition of psychedelics could be seen as an infringement on personal liberty, just as Objectivists would argue that any government intervention that restricts personal freedom is unjust.
The overlap between libertarian and Objectivist views on personal autonomy provides a useful framework for understanding the philosophical debates surrounding psychedelics. Both schools of thought emphasize the importance of individual choice, which could be extended to the use of psychedelics, particularly when it comes to responsible, informed usage.
The Objectivist View on Reality and Altered States
One of the core tenets of Objectivism is the belief in an objective reality that exists independent of human perception. Psychedelics, which induce altered states of consciousness, are often criticized for distorting one’s perception of reality. For Objectivists, this poses a significant challenge: If reality is objective and immutable, how could the subjective, altered experiences induced by psychedelics be reconciled with the philosophy’s core principles?
A potential argument against the use of psychedelics from an Objectivist standpoint is that they impair rational judgment. Rand’s emphasis on reason as the sole means of acquiring knowledge means that any state that diminishes the clarity of one’s perception would likely be seen as detrimental. Furthermore, altered states could be viewed as a departure from rational self-interest, leading an individual away from objective reality and, by extension, undermining their ability to pursue their values effectively.
However, it is possible to argue that responsible use of psychedelics, particularly in a controlled, therapeutic setting, might not conflict with Objectivist principles. For example, microdosing—where small amounts of psychedelics are taken to enhance creativity or mental clarity—could be seen as a tool for rational self-improvement. In this context, psychedelics might serve as a means to expand one’s understanding of reality, rather than distort it.
Rational Self-Interest and Risk-Benefit Analysis
Another key element of Objectivism is the concept of rational self-interest. Objectivists prioritize making decisions that enhance their well-being and ability to achieve their values. This presents a significant tension when considering the use of psychedelics, as they come with potential risks, such as impaired judgment or mental health consequences for some individuals.
An Objectivist might question whether the potential benefits of psychedelics—such as enhanced creativity or therapeutic relief—outweigh these risks. While some argue that psychedelics can foster personal growth and self-discovery, others would contend that the possible dangers of such substances, particularly in uncontrolled environments, make them incompatible with rational self-interest.
However, as research continues to reveal the potential benefits of psychedelics, particularly in the context of mental health and therapeutic use, Objectivists may find room to reevaluate their stance. If psychedelics are used with clear intention, in moderation, and under controlled conditions, they could align with the Objectivist pursuit of personal development and rational self-interest.
Conclusion
The relationship between Objectivism and psychedelics is complex and multifaceted. While the core tenets of Rand’s philosophy seem to be at odds with the effects of psychedelics, a closer examination reveals that responsible use may not be entirely incompatible with Objectivist values. In particular, the emphasis on personal freedom, rational self-interest, and the pursuit of knowledge could provide a framework for justifying the responsible use of psychedelics. As our understanding of these substances continues to evolve, both Objectivists and broader society must reconsider their perspectives on the potential benefits and risks of psychedelics, particularly as new research sheds light on their therapeutic applications.
This piece solely expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the magazine as a whole. SpeakFreely is committed to facilitating a broad dialogue for liberty, representing a variety of opinions. Support freedom and independent journalism by donating today.
