The Austrian election took place during a time of economic frustration and increasing political dissatisfaction. The far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ), led by Herbert Kickl, emerged as the largest party but fell short of securing a majority to govern independently. Before the election, the country was governed by a conservative-green coalition, which faced significant public pressure following the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, the conservative-green government abandoned sound economic principles for short-term voter demands—handing out money, increasing deficit spending, and introducing market interventions. These choices worsened the economic situation, pushing Austria into one of the EU’s worst recessions, with inflation spiraling out of control. This failure allowed the FPÖ’s populist rhetoric to resonate with voters disillusioned with the status quo.
What Happened: Election Results and Voter Sentiment
The Austrian election marked a significant shift in voter sentiment, driven by dissatisfaction with the government’s economic mismanagement and its response to public pressure. The far-right FPÖ became the largest party for the first time, securing 28.8% of the total vote. Their anti-establishment message resonated with voters who felt abandoned by the government during the recession and rising inflation.
The conservative People Party (ÖVP), led by Chancellor Karl Nehammer, fell to second place with 26.3%, losing credibility as a conservative party after abandoning fiscal responsibility and caving to populist demands.
The Social-Democratic Party (SPÖ), under Andreas Babler, recorded its worst-ever result with only 21.1% of the vote, as it swung to the left—with calls for wealth and inheritance taxes— which alienated many centrist voters.
The liberal party (NEOS) achieved its best result to date with 9.1%, but, like other liberal movements in Austria, struggled to gain broader appeal. Business-friendly reforms and liberal policies have historically faced resistance among Austrian voters, who often lean towards more interventionist or socialist approaches.
Once strong on climate issues, the Greens saw a sharp decline to 8.2% as economic concerns outweighed environmental policies. Despite widespread frustration, voter turnout increased slightly to 77.7%, reflecting a strong demand for change.
Key Moments and Party Strategies: COVID-19 and Economic Mismanagement
A major factor shaping this election was the government’s mishandling of the COVID-19 crisis and its economic fallout. The ÖVP-Green coalition responded to public pressure by abandoning conservative fiscal discipline, opting instead for increased deficit spending, market interventions, and handouts. These measures worsened the country’s economic outlook, resulting in high inflation and a recession. The FPÖ capitalized on this dissatisfaction, positioning itself as the only true opposition to the government’s failures, even though its platform centered more on immigration and national “values” rather than offering real economic solutions.
The SPÖ also failed to effectively address economic concerns. Internal leadership struggles pushed the party to adopt a more leftward platform, calling for wealth and inheritance taxes, which alienated centrist voters who might have otherwise been drawn to their message. This lack of unity and clear direction further weakened their campaign.
The Greens, who were the weaker part of the coalition government, suffered as economic concerns overshadowed climate priorities. NEOS, while presenting itself as a liberal option, struggled to cut through the noise with a coherent message that appealed to a wide audience. Their focus on entrepreneurship and social liberal causes was not enough to sway a large portion of the electorate.
Ultimately, the FPÖ’s ability to tap into public frustration—regardless of whether their solutions were practical—allowed them to dominate the opposition narrative. The other parties were left defending their records or presenting alternatives that did not resonate with a disillusioned electorate.
Coalition Possibilities: A Delicate Balance for the Future
With the election over, the focus has shifted to coalition-building. Although the FPÖ is the largest party, it cannot govern on its own and will need to form a partnership with other parties. This puts it in a unique position: whether it joins the government or stays in opposition, it has significant leverage. If included, it will need to prove it can govern effectively; if excluded, it will continue to build momentum as the main opposition.
For the ÖVP, the choice is equally tricky. Forming a coalition with the FPÖ could alienate centrist voters while excluding them could strengthen the FPÖ’s position in the opposition. Another option is a coalition between the ÖVP, SPÖ, and NEOS, but this would be an unstable alliance. The SPÖ’s leftward policies clash with NEOS’ business-friendly stance, and the ÖVP’s own shift away from conservative fiscal discipline complicates things.
NEOS faces its own risks. Despite presenting itself as a liberal, pro-entrepreneurship party, it’s unclear whether it has strong enough market principles to retain its core classical liberal voters. If NEOS compromises too much in a coalition, especially on economic issues, it could lose support from voters who are more committed to free-market policies.
Given their losses, the Greens are unlikely to play a significant role in coalition negotiations. In the end, the FPÖ’s strong performance gives them leverage, whether they govern or remain in opposition. Ultimately, any coalition will face considerable challenges, particularly in addressing economic recovery and rebuilding public trust.
Conclusion: The Challenge for Classical Liberals
Austria’s election results reflect deep public dissatisfaction and a demand for change. The rise of the FPÖ, the fall of the Greens, and the struggles of the mainstream parties demonstrate widespread disillusionment with the status quo. For classical liberals, this election offers both challenges and opportunities.
The incoming government—regardless of its composition—will have to navigate serious economic difficulties. Classical liberals must push for sound, market-oriented reforms, emphasizing long-term prosperity over short-term political gains. The recent abandonment of conservative fiscal principles in favour of populist policies by the ÖVP has shown how damaging economic compromises can be.
The path forward is uncertain, but those who value liberty, economic freedom, and individual responsibility must take this opportunity to propose practical solutions. Critiquing populist rhetoric is not enough; concrete, economically sound alternatives must be presented to ensure Austria can rediscover its foundational principles of freedom and prosperity.
This piece solely expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the organisation as a whole. Students For Liberty is committed to facilitating a broad dialogue for liberty, representing a variety of opinions. If you’re interested in presenting your perspective on this blog, click here to send us your own piece submission!
